<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blackkettle &#187; Ruby-in-Lightwave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.blackkettle.org/category/projects/ruby-in-lightwave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.blackkettle.org</link>
	<description>Things of Occasional Interest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ruby-in-LightWave</title>
		<link>http://blog.blackkettle.org/2006/08/12/ruby-in-lightwave/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.blackkettle.org/2006/08/12/ruby-in-lightwave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 06:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LightWave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby-in-Lightwave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blackkettle.org/2006/08/12/ruby-in-lightwave/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This project is at the &#8220;wouldn&#8217;t it be cool&#8221; stage so far. The idea is to compile Ruby as a LightWave plugin, and add an extension to give it access to the LightWave SDK. This would make it a feasible alternative to LScript for prototyping, which I can&#8217;t help but see as a good thing. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This project is at the &#8220;wouldn&#8217;t it be cool&#8221; stage so far. The idea is to compile Ruby as a LightWave plugin, and add an extension to give it access to the LightWave SDK. This would make it a feasible alternative to LScript for prototyping, which I can&#8217;t help but see as a good thing. There&#8217;s also the outside possibility of being able to use RubyInline (or something related) to generate actual compiled plugin code, which I think would be outstanding.</p>
<p>More on this as it happens.  I might have a little play today, and see what I can see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.blackkettle.org/2006/08/12/ruby-in-lightwave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
